A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial evaluating the effect of a polyphenol-rich whole food supplement on PSA progression in men with prostate cancer--the U.K. NCRN Pomi-T study.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. 2014;17(2):180-6

Plain language summary

Green tea, pomegranate, curcumin and broccoli have been shown to have anti-cancer effects in pre-clinical studies. The aim of this double-blind placebo controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of wholefood extracts from these foods in men with prostate cancer as evaluated by progression of PSA (prostate specific antigen), a prostate cancer marker, over a six months intervention period. There was a statistically and clinically significant reduction in PSA progression in the supplement group compared to the placebo group, and significantly more men in the supplement group had no PSA progression compared to placebo group. The number of adverse effects was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No interactions were seen between the supplement and warfarin and blood pressure lowering medication. The authors conclude that this wholefood supplement offers significant short-term benefits, and encourage larger studies into longer term benefits.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Polyphenol-rich foods such as pomegranate, green tea, broccoli and turmeric have demonstrated anti-neoplastic effects in laboratory models involving angiogenesis, apoptosis and proliferation. Although some have been investigated in small, phase II studies, this combination has never been evaluated within an adequately powered randomised controlled trial. METHODS In total, 199 men, average age 74 years, with localised prostate cancer, 60% managed with primary active surveillance (AS) or 40% with watchful waiting (WW) following previous interventions, were randomised (2:1) to receive an oral capsule containing a blend of pomegranate, green tea, broccoli and turmeric, or an identical placebo for 6 months. RESULTS The median rise in PSA in the food supplement group (FSG) was 14.7% (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 3.4-36.7%), as opposed to 78.5% in the placebo group (PG) (95% CI 48.1-115.5%), difference 63.8% (P=0.0008). In all, 8.2% of men in the FSG and 27.7% in the PG opted to leave surveillance at the end of the intervention (χ2 P=0.014). There were no significant differences within the predetermined subgroups of age, Gleason grade, treatment category or body mass index. There were no differences in cholesterol, blood pressure, blood sugar, C-reactive protein or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS This study found a significant short-term, favourable effect on the percentage rise in PSA in men managed with AS and WW following ingestion of this well-tolerated, specific blend of concentrated foods. Its influence on decision-making suggests that this intervention is clinically meaningful, but further trials will evaluate longer term clinical effects, and other makers of disease progression.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Immune and inflammation
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Polyphenols
Environmental Inputs : Nutrients
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Not applicable
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood
Bioactive Substances : Curcumin ; Green tea ; Pomegranate ; Broccoli

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 5
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Prostate cancer ; Curcumin ; Green tea ; Pomegranate ; Broccoli